Already loss In Command
WHY RESIGN ?? -
unless have done something wrong
WAS IT
1. After the 26th AGM, at the first General Meeting, held in June 2010, the MA warned the then chairman, that all the action the chairman decide or taken was his own responsibility.
For:-
Calling for the Investigation of Proxies of the 26th AGM
Second (2nd ) Council Meeting 20th July 2010
Item 2.0
The Chairman informed the meeting that the previous Council meeting was suspended for the reasons as recorded in the minutes of the 1st Council Meeting.
Accordingly, as directed by the Council at the 1st Council Meeting, the Chairman and the Managing Agent proceeded to conduct company search for all the companies that submitted proxies at the 26th Annual General Meeting, in order to verify the signatories as received at the 26th Annual General Meeting. The Chairman confirmed to the meeting that the proxies' signatories were all, in order after the companies search and verification, as to the names, Nric No. and positions of all the proxies' signatories.
Knowing that the BMSM Acts state clearly:-
Chairperson’s declaration of vote
10. The declaration of the chairperson of the result of the voting
on any proposal submitted at a general meeting of the management corporation or
(as the case may be) subsidiary management corporation, otherwise than on a
poll, shall be conclusive without proof of the votes recorded for or against
the proposal.
Supply of false or misleading information to Commissioner
127.
(1) Any person who knowingly or recklessly provides the Commissioner with information which is false or misleading in a material particular shall be guilty of an offence if the information is provided -
(a) in purported compliance with a requirement imposed by or under this Act; and
(b) otherwise than as mentioned in paragraph (a) but in circumstances in which the person providing the information intends, or could reasonably be expected to know, that it would
b) causes or permits the alteration, suppression, concealment or destruction of,intention of falsifying the document or record or enabling that organisation or individual to evade any provision of this Act shall be guilty of an offence.
(2) Any person who -\
(a) alters, suppresses, conceals or destroys; or any document or other record relating to the financial affairs or transactions of an owner developer, a management corporation or subsidiary management corporation with the
(3) Any person guilty of an offence under this
section shall be liable on conviction to a
fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.
2. Resigned because he had failed to
resolve the painting of white lots
into the addition of 3 RED unofficial
containers lots after 6 months of
meetings and also have not been able to convince the MC to retain the
ex MA.
3. Badly manage the Renovation of Toilets on the following issue
Knowing
(a) that a council member
has not declare his interest in the
contract
Disclosure of interests in contracts, property, offices, etc.
60. —
(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), if a member of a council has a pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in any contract, proposed contract or other matter which is before any meeting of the council or management corporation, he shall at that meeting —
(a) declare the nature of his interest;
(b) not take part in the consideration or discussion of, or vote on any question with respect to, that contract or proposed contract or other matter; and
5) Every member of a council who holds any office or possesses any property whereby, directly or indirectly, duties or interests might be created in conflict with his duties or interests as a member of the council shall declare at a meeting of the council the fact and the nature, character and extent of the conflict.
(b) failed to confirmed that the
renovation contractor has a
valid business license
The business license expired
on 1st Oct 2007 and ROC
cancelled their license on 3rd Feb 2008 after
they collect their
final payment on 29th Jan 2008 from the MC
(c)
failed to see a proper
contract before the contractor
starts work.
The contract was signed on 26th
October 2007 and backdated to
14th September 2007
(d) failed to notify all SP and instructed all MC members to keep all matters confidential added that the decision made by MC should be kept confidential and not to discuss with the SP
(e) To instruct the MA to write a circular to all unit owners
that the toilets were under repair &
maintenance based
on relevant authorities' requirement.
( No authority has written to MCST to repair the toilets)
4. Failure to handle the issue of overloading of #03-01
Claims that on one occasion, the MC was sued by one of the SPs over the allocation or usage of electric power. It was rather messy and he needed to do a lot of further work to prepare the case together with the lawyers .It was the result of some wrong information given by the then MA, to the SP , who in the end, lost a few hundred thousands dollars. The matter was pursued by the SP causing the MC to incurred more that S$10,000 fees on legal fees.
The
actual fees was $3,750
5. Failure to carry out the decision of the MC
Claims
to respect 100% the decision of the MC but in the
instance of the drawing of the Container lots there is
a “Back
Hand”, therefore he will not respect the decision.
Claims that he is adopting a neutral
stand and is not bending
100% towards R Ong side.
6. Lost of credibility
20th Dec 2010 Resignation letter
I strongly feel
that the current MC lacks credibility and professionalism in its
decisions making. The recent decisions adopted at the
last AGM for the main
body to appoint the Four Office Bearers, the decision concerning the drawing
of the car park lines over the container
lines as well as the proposed
replacement of the current Managing Agent, DTZ, for a New Managing Agent,
in my opinion, are all the wrong decisions.
These were adopted for the wrong reasons despite my objections supported by
strong arguments as a slight majority of the MC
Members have their own
personal agenda.
I strongly feel
these decisions were adopted and Approved by the slight
majority are not in the best interests of AIC.
Date: 20th December, 2010 Open Letter
I, as the Chairman of the current Management Council, would like
to state openly
that I do not support the Replacement of the
current Managing Agent, DTZ. My
decision is made after carefully
taking into considerations all the pros and
cons as deliberated
