Members Cannot Do Anything
SPEAK UP SPEAK UP SPEAK UP SPEAK UP SPEAK UP SPEAK UP SPEAK UP
|
Liar Liar.mp3 Size : 1183.799 Kb Type : mp3 |
|
|
liar_liar_burn_in_hell.mp3 Size : 4830.364 Kb Type : mp3 |
After Many Years the Coffer in the MC grew
______________________________________
ATTRACTED the FOLLOWING Characters
1997
JOIN as a MEMBER
The Following Year Became
the CHAIRMAN
2004
FIRST YEAR > SEE
SECOND YEAR > I SIT
2007 
click above
2009
BOSS - U SAY RIGHT MEANS
I SURE FOLLOW
U RESIGN - I ALSO RESIGN
U WITHDRAW RESIGNATION
I ALSO WITHDRAW MY RESIGNATION
The STORY begin with
APES IN COMMAND
ARROGANT, INSOLENCE & COMMANDING
唔系你估啊！
" Even I'M a LAME Duck " -
" I say NO means NO "
- " So what you vote
7 - 4 - 3 " as majority"
Every Month I Bring In
30 Containers
NO! no! NO! ---- YOU LIED 
--- Records showed, you have only 3
Containers coming into the Complex
Good for Nothing Follower
The Decision is the Council - Nothing to Do with Me
@ AGM 2011
WE OBJECTED to a Subsidary PROPRIETOR Who holds & have a Total of 17 PROXIES to
be a Council Member
MA Reply:-
Under BSMS Act - NO One can DENY a Subsidary Proprietor to stand for ELECTION
unless he is not qualified to. Being ELECTED to be a Council Member would depends
on the POLLS and the support of the REST of the Subsidary PROPRIETORS
@ AGM 2011 the FOUR APES IN COMMAND was NOT VOTED IN
@ AGM 2011 After BEING BOOT OUT
& at a Mc Meeting
Demand : " WE ARE RIGHT - YOU ALL ARE WRONG 
Almighty Chairman
mAster mind direCtor
A blind direCtor
trouble mAker direCtor
STILL WANTS TO COMMAND THE MANAGEMENT - in PHANTOM
Quotes :-
Big people gets the Credit - even if they lies
Justice is blind, deaf and dumb.
LAME DUCK SAYS !!!! 
1. the ACCOUNTs is Not RIGHT ???
2. I WANT to KNOW the LIST OF PROXIES
This Is my LAST FAREWELL SPEECHAnswer : ACCOUNTS ARE IN ORDER
LIST of PROXIES will be GIVEN to YOU after this RESOLUTION is PASSED
YA - YA : YOU HAVE ALREADY SOLD YOUR UNIT & HAVE No MORE INTEREST & MOST
of the MATTERS does NOT CONCERN YOU ANY MORE
( LAU KWEUA )
Wa - SOME MEMBERS have so many PROXIES
We SURE LOSE
WE SHOULD NOT STAND FOR ELECTIONS
<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>
I STRONGLY OPPOSE Mr XXX to be A COUNCIL MEMBER the REPLY :
Under the Provision of BMSM Act, ANY Subsidary Proprietor can STAND for ELECTION
to be a Council Member. Other S/P cannot DENY HIM the right to Stand for Election
Our Parking CHARGES for a 40 ft container for 5 days is $1584 ,
It is one of the highest rate for a industrial estate.
Why do you need to charge the motorist so high.
the REPLY :
the Charges for the first DAY is $20 and second DAY is $40 Owners / Tenant usually
load or unload the containers in 2 days. According to Records, NO Owner / Tenant
have ever paid the HIGH Charges during the last few years. Cheap Charges have
encouraged them to Park longer thus obstructing others for using the parking
facilities.
The Writer was the one who have EVER PAID $1,584 . That happened more than 10
years ago. The WRITER did not raise the issue during his Tenors as a MC member
from 2007 to 2011
** WE DEMAND THE MANAGEMENT to INVESTIGATE & GET the MEMBER or
MEMBERS, ex COUNCIL MEMBER (s) to CLOSE or TAKE DOWN The TWO Web Sites
" www.Aicleaks.yolasite.com " and " http://aicleaks.yolasite.com ", immediately,
failing which legal actions will be taken to investigate the person or persons
responsible for setting up these two sites.
The BLOG DISGRACE the MANAGEMENT & the FOUR of US
the REPLY :
the Management is not related to the BLOG. the cost to get the lawyer to look into
the matter may cost $500 to $1,000 and full investigation & prosecution if any may
reach $100,000 or more. It may take one year or more. Members present were asked
to VOTE for or against using MC funds to pursue the matter.
NO MANDATE was GIVEN by ALL PRESENCE to adopt the Motion
** IT IS NOT RIGHT TO USE THE MANAGEMENTS FUNDS FOR YOUR OWN CRUSADE **
We demand the Management to investigate why 22 car owners refused to submit the old discs in exchange for the New Passes.
Were these 22 car discs issued illegally or unauthorized ?.
Who is responsible and was there any financial benefits ?.
Was there any abuse or misuse of Authority or one or more MC or Ex-MC
Member (s) together with any staffmember of the previous Managing Agent?
The sum involved is significant and not a small figure - assuming S$80 per car park disc per month and over a period of say 10 years - -the total sum
amounts to a high $211,200.
the REPLY : All the 22 Old disc has been accounted for. No disc were issued illegally. Few were not
used including a member of the written 4 petitioners (ex MC members) . One of the
petitioner has also loan the Car entry pass to his tenant / neighbour for a fee of $80
which was illegal, as the CarEntry Disc is not transferable or rentable.
The Management does not collect any fees for the usage of the Car entry pass except
the 5 Carpark lots purported sold by the 4 petitioners.
*** Note:
the 4 Petitioners (ex Council Members) has been in the management committee for
more than 5 years and were awared that NO FEES were collected for the CAR ENTRY
PASS. By Putting up this Motion - are the 4 Petitioners trying to discredit the current
committee.
AFTER I JOINED AS A MC MEMBER, I HAVE HELP THE MC SAVED ON $$$$1) I GOT MY CONTRACTOR TO CLEANED THE WATER TANKS @ $800 instead of
giving to the Previous Water Tank contractor who charged $1,200.
2) I have Sold 5 CAR park Lots @ $80 per lot per month giving an income of $400 per
month. However we were threatened by a MC member who got a Lawyer to sue
the MC.
3) I have renovated the Lobby with new Awnings and change the Directory
Signage giving the Lobby a New Look
the REPLY :
1. The New Contractor did not do a good job. Many areas was not properly painted.
The Tanks & support are now corroded and it will cost few thousand dollars to
rectify it.
2. The car park lots were sold to some associates and did not comply to the
procedures of tendering. It was withdrawn.
The Mc member who intervene did not threaten or got a Lawyer to sue.
He only wants to write to BCA and URA to get permission for the change of
use of carparks to paid season parking.
3. The replacements of Awnings & Directory was a waste of funds.
4. The Facade still looks the same as before upgrade
*********************************************************************
What was SPENT
$100,265.00 on the TOILETS UpGrade
for 2nd Floor & Canteen TOILETS
ON the UNAUTHORISE RENOVATION
WITHOUT PROPER APPROVAL FROM THE COMMITTEEE
&
WITHOUT AGM APPROVAL
<<<<< >>>>>
Blk 6-- # 2nd LEVEL MALE TOILET
SO BE IT - LETS FORGET ABOUT IT ~~~~~~ followers : { UMMM - OK }
